<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rss version='2.0'   xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>  <channel xml:base='http://www.milanin.com/members/giuseppe.bonaccorso/weblog/'>
    <title>Business Analyst :: Technology Visionary :: Open Networker</title>
    <description>The weblog for Giuseppe Bonaccorso, hosted on Business Club Milan IN.</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <link>http://www.milanin.com/members/giuseppe.bonaccorso/weblog/</link>    <item>
        <title>Social Connection Strategies</title>
        <link>http://www.milanin.com/members/giuseppe.bonaccorso/weblog/657.html</link>
        <guid>http://www.milanin.com/members/giuseppe.bonaccorso/weblog/657.html</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:54:21 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>I&amp;rsquo;ve read several articles about a good way to enlarge one&amp;rsquo;s own network inside &lt;strong&gt;LinkedIn&lt;/strong&gt; or other social networking tools: it could be a rather &amp;ldquo;simple&amp;rdquo; task given the number of involved users, however a bit of strategy may prevent some common mistakes that can penalize this brand new kind of &amp;ldquo;&lt;em&gt;gold rush&lt;/em&gt;&amp;ldquo;&amp;hellip; That&amp;rsquo;s my recipe: &lt;p&gt;There are some particular groups made up of &lt;strong&gt;open networkers&lt;/strong&gt; (just like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themetanetwork.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LION&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://opennetworkers.ning.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;OpenNetworkers.info&lt;/a&gt;, for instance) which purpose is to create communities of people who are interested in connecting among themselves. This is obviously a good way to find out new potential contacts, but it can easily turn into a very frustrating stumble if a person has a limited number of invitations (just like inside LinkedIn, where there&amp;rsquo;s a limitation of 3000 attempts) and &amp;ldquo;throw away&amp;rdquo; them all only with other internal members.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The reason is simple: each group established in order to encourage mutual connections is destined to become an isle inside a social network as its &lt;strong&gt;clustering coefficient&lt;/strong&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clustering_coefficient&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;*&lt;/a&gt;) gets higher and higher with an extraordinary density of links and the number of new members remains quite lower than the daily increment of internal connections.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In other words, such a straining, if abused, may bring about an outstanding limitation of any possibility to exploit a &amp;ldquo;Small World&amp;rdquo; network and its easy-fillable gap between levels of connection. Thus I believe that a good advice for an open-networking start-up is to try and find new potential contacts looking at the &amp;ldquo;boudaries&amp;rdquo; of such groups and giving an higher weight to 3rd (or more) level connections rather than nearer &amp;ldquo;friends&amp;rdquo; with thousands of common links.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In order to understand this kind of strategy you can use the network analyzed supplied by LinkedIn: it&amp;rsquo;s not absolutely difficult to discover that growth-speed of 2nd level connections is lower and lower than 1st level one ! That&amp;rsquo;s a clear sign that the majority of our new links are bringing only common friends and shortly (with an imposed limitation, above all) our network will saturate in a kind of equilibrium point where our possibility to expand it is now next to zero.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So exploit the potential of open networking, but remember to keep a sufficient number of unused invitations for your &amp;ldquo;exotic, rare &lt;em&gt;souvenirs&lt;/em&gt;&amp;rdquo; !&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>  </channel>
</rss>